In Defense of New Super Mario Bros 2; Is it really that bad a game?
Because some people seem to have gone all end of the world/panic mode about New Super Mario Bros 2 and started ranting about the downfall of Nintendo and the Mario series, here are some reasons not to pre judge the game by just four screenshots.
1. It doesn’t look as good as Kid Icarus Uprising!
So? Most 3DS don’t and most future ones won’t either including most by Nintendo. Does every game under the sun have to use the full power of the console it’s released on now?
It’s perfectly reasonable to think Nintendo were lazy with the graphics in New Super Mario Bros 2. But be a bit more rational here, there’s nothing particularly wrong with the style either and it isn’t really that different from the one in Super Mario 3D Land or any other recent Mario game. Besides gameplay is far more important than graphics, and comparing this game to Kid Icarus is comparing apples and oranges.
2. Being mostly made of familiar elements from past games isn’t a bad thing
Really, that’s what most recent Mario games have consisted of. Was the shift from New Super Mario Bros to New Super Mario Bros Wii really much more of a shift than the one from New Super Mario Bros 1 to New Super Mario Bros?
But more importantly, many of the elements Nintendo seem to be bringing back are ones fans have wanted for ages. How long have people wanted Raccoon Mario and proper flight again? And if these elements are in New Super Mario Bros 2, who knows what else could turn up. Look at some of the array of classic things New Super Mario Bros Wii brought back:
- Rideable Yoshi
- Kamek + transformations
- Airship Levels
- Spikes (those spike ball turtle enemies)
- Boo Rings
- POW Blocks…
3. It’s too similar to NSMB… Choose your poison carefully
Really, for all the people complaining it’s too much like the first two New Super Mario Bros games, keep in mind what happened in the past every time Nintendo (or anyone else) tried to drastically change their beloved series and try something new.
People hated it for being new and different to the older games. Remember a well known game called Super Mario Sunshine? It’s a great game and it was very different to the Mario games before and after it. Pity fans hated various elements and practically every new character it introduced, at least initially.
It also sold the least of all Mario platformers in history. Meanwhile look at games that didn’t change a whole lot like New Super Mario Bros and you get games which sold well over 20 million copies and ended up making Nintendo an absolute ton of money. Is it really any surprise why they stuck with what’s familiar in making this game?
4. We’ve seen just four screenshots
Isn’t that just a little early to judge a game? We don’t even have any gameplay footage or any form of trailer yet and who knows what’s in this game that we can’t already see?
Look at New Super Mario Bros Wii for instance. It’s not the most ambitious game in the world or the best possible 2D Mario platformer ever but it definitely turned out to be better than people expected. The boss battles were excellent:
How many boss battles are shown in these screenshots again? Zero. Heck we don’t even know who’s helping Bowser in this one, or (at least in theory) whether Bowser is even involved in the first place.
Another thing that was at least decent about the New Super Mario Bros games was the music. Yes the grass land theme was annoying and overused. But I don’t know anyone who disliked the castle music so far, in either game:
But seeing as we have no footage of the game and hence no way to hear any of the soundtrack we don’t know in the slightest how catchy some of the music might be. For all we know that desert level could have something majestic and almost egyptian sounding playing in the background that makes people think it’s awesome. Like this:
Not as if people on the internet seem to care, half of them seem to think anything not orchestrated is no better than elevator music nowadays. Yes Super Mario Galaxy had the better soundtrack, but that doesn’t mean the music in New Super Mario Bros is mediocre or bad. Or that New Super Mario Bros 2 won’t have an even better soundtrack than the last two New Super Mario Bros games…
Another thing that can’t be judged is the quality of the level design, whether the levels will be fun to play in general or what gimmicks may show up in the rest of the game. For all the ‘OMG rehash’ comments New Super Mario Bros Wii got for being like its predecessor, it’s hardly as if the game didn’t have a ton of gimmicks and clever tricks up its sleeve in the later levels.
We don’t even know if this game will have the same world themes as the last two New Super Mario Bros games will. Yes it’s got a forest world, a grass world and a snow/ice world. Oh wait, it’s got levels with those themes. But so did Super Mario 3D Land which turned out to have no themed worlds whatsoever. Might the same thing apply here? Or perhaps Nintendo might even return to a more Super Mario World type map. Who knows?
All in all, be reasonable and actually wait for some more information before judging this game as a lazy rehash or the death of Nintendo or the Mario series or anything else. Don’t go judging games based on exactly four screenshots and assume you know what happens in the rest of the entire game as a result.